Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 5: Difference between revisions
From Wiki**3
New page: Compute the non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) by using Thompson's algorithm. Compute the minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA). The alphabet is Σ = { a, b }. Indicate the nu... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows: | |||
<graph> | <graph> | ||
| Line 133: | Line 131: | ||
0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10] | 0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10] | ||
1 -> 3 [label="b",fontsize=10] | 1 -> 3 [label="b",fontsize=10] | ||
3 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] | 3 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] | ||
4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] | 4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] | ||
| Line 161: | Line 158: | ||
Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is exactly the same as the original DFA (all leaf sets are singular). | Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is exactly the same as the original DFA (all leaf sets are singular). | ||
<!-- | |||
< | === Input Analysis === | ||
{| cellspacing="2" | |||
! style="padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; background: wheat;" | I<sub>n</sub> | |||
! style="padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; background: wheat;" | Input | |||
! style="padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; background: wheat;" | I<sub>n+1</sub> / Token | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 0 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #ffffcc;" | <tt>abaabb$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 1 | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 1 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #ffffcc;" | <tt>baabb$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 3 | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 3 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #ffffcc;" | <tt>aabb$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | T1 | |||
</ | |- | ||
-- | ! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #e6e6e6;" | 0 | ||
! style="text-align: | ! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #e6e6e6;" | <tt>aabb$</tt> | ||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #e6e6e6;" | 1 | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #e6e6e6;" | 1 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #e6e6e6;" | <tt>abb$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #e6e6e6;" | T1 | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 0 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #ffffcc;" | <tt>abb$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 1 | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 1 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #ffffcc;" | <tt>bb$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 3 | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 3 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #ffffcc;" | <tt>b$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 4 | |||
|- | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | 4 | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; text-align: right; background: #ffffcc;" | <tt>$</tt> | |||
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #ffffcc;" | T2 | |||
|} | |} | ||
The input string ''abaabb'' is, after 9 steps, split into three tokens: T1 (corresponding to lexeme ''ab''), T1 (''a''), and T2 (''abb''). | |||
[[category:Teaching]] | [[category:Teaching]] | ||
[[category:Compilers]] | [[category:Compilers]] | ||
[[en:Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis]] | [[en:Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis]] | ||
Revision as of 03:54, 22 March 2009
Compute the non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) by using Thompson's algorithm. Compute the minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA). The alphabet is Σ = { a, b }. Indicate the number of processing steps for the given input string.
- G = { ab, ab*, a|b }, input string = abaabb
Solution
NFA
The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm. State 3 recognizes the first expression (token T1); state 8 recognizes token T2; and state 14 recognizes token T3.
<graph> digraph nfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 3 8 14
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1 1 -> 2 [label="a",fontsize=10] 2 -> 3 [label="b",fontsize=10]
0 -> 4 4 -> 5 [label="a",fontsize=10] 5 -> 6 5 -> 8 6 -> 7 [label="b",fontsize=10] 7 -> 6 7 -> 8
0 -> 9 9 -> 10 9 -> 12 10 -> 11 [label="a",fontsize=10] 12 -> 13 [label="b",fontsize=10] 11 -> 14 13 -> 14 fontsize=10 //label="NFA for (a|b)*abb(a|b)*"
} </graph>
DFA
Determination table for the above NFA:
| In | α∈Σ | move(In, α) | ε-closure(move(In, α)) | In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 0 | 0, 1, 4, 9, 10, 12 | 0 |
| 0 | a | 2, 5, 11 | 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 14 | 1 (T2) |
| 0 | b | 13 | 13, 14 | 2 (T3) |
| 1 | a | - | - | - |
| 1 | b | 3, 7 | 3, 6, 7, 8 | 3 (T1) |
| 2 | a | - | - | - |
| 2 | b | - | - | - |
| 3 | a | - | - | - |
| 3 | b | 7 | 6, 7, 8 | 4 (T2) |
| 4 | a | - | - | - |
| 4 | b | 7 | 6, 7, 8 | 4 (T2) |
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:
<graph> digraph dfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 1 2 3 4
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1 [label="a",fontsize=10]
0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10]
1 -> 3 [label="b",fontsize=10]
3 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
//label="DFA for (a|b)*abb(a|b)*"
} </graph>
The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize.
<graph> digraph mintree {
node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{0}" [label="NF",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{1, 2, 3, 4}" [label=" F",fontsize=10]
"{1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{3}" [label=" T1",fontsize=10]
"{1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{1, 4}" [label=" T2",fontsize=10]
"{1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{2}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10]
"{1, 4}" -> "{1}" //[label=" T3",fontsize=10]
"{1, 4}" -> "{4}" [label=" b",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
//label="Minimization tree"
} </graph>
The tree expansion for non-splitting sets has been omitted for simplicity ("a" transition for final states {1, 4}).
Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is exactly the same as the original DFA (all leaf sets are singular).
Input Analysis
| In | Input | In+1 / Token |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | abaabb$ | 1 |
| 1 | baabb$ | 3 |
| 3 | aabb$ | T1 |
| 0 | aabb$ | 1 |
| 1 | abb$ | T1 |
| 0 | abb$ | 1 |
| 1 | bb$ | 3 |
| 3 | b$ | 4 |
| 4 | $ | T2 |
The input string abaabb is, after 9 steps, split into three tokens: T1 (corresponding to lexeme ab), T1 (a), and T2 (abb).