Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 18: Difference between revisions
From Wiki**3
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
State '''5''' recognizes the first expression (token '''T1'''); state '''13''' recognizes token '''T2'''; and state '''18''' recognizes token '''T3'''. | State '''5''' recognizes the first expression (token '''T1'''); state '''13''' recognizes token '''T2'''; and state '''18''' recognizes token '''T3'''. | ||
< | <dot-hack> | ||
digraph nfa { | digraph nfa { | ||
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | { node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
fontsize=10 | fontsize=10 | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </dot-hack> | ||
== DFA == | == DFA == | ||
| Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows: | Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows: | ||
< | <dot-hack> | ||
digraph dfa { | digraph dfa { | ||
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | { node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | ||
| Line 225: | Line 225: | ||
fontsize=10 | fontsize=10 | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </dot-hack> | ||
The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize. | The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize. | ||
< | <dot-hack> | ||
digraph mintree { | digraph mintree { | ||
node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10] | node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10] | ||
| Line 237: | Line 237: | ||
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " -> "{0, 3, 4}" [label=" T2",fontsize=10] | "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " -> "{0, 3, 4}" [label=" T2",fontsize=10] | ||
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " -> "{2, 6}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10] | "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " -> "{2, 6}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10] | ||
"{1, 5}" -> "{1}" | "{1, 5}" -> "{1}" | ||
"{1, 5}" -> "{5}" [label=" a",fontsize=10] | "{1, 5}" -> "{5}" [label=" a",fontsize=10] | ||
"{0, 3, 4}" -> "{0}" | "{0, 3, 4}" -> "{0}" | ||
"{0, 3, 4}" -> "{3, 4}" [label=" a",fontsize=10] | "{0, 3, 4}" -> "{3, 4}" [label=" a",fontsize=10] | ||
"{3, 4}" -> "{3, 4} " [label=" a,b,c",fontsize=10] | "{3, 4}" -> "{3, 4} " [label=" a,b,c",fontsize=10] | ||
| Line 246: | Line 246: | ||
//label="Minimization tree" | //label="Minimization tree" | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </dot-hack> | ||
Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens. | Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens. | ||
< | <dot-hack> | ||
digraph mindfa { | digraph mindfa { | ||
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | { node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | ||
| Line 267: | Line 267: | ||
fontsize=10 | fontsize=10 | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </dot-hack> | ||
== Input Analysis == | == Input Analysis == | ||
Revision as of 10:37, 12 February 2019
Compute the non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) by using Thompson's algorithm. Compute the minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA).
The alphabet is Σ = { a, b, c }. Indicate the number of processing steps for the given input string.
- G = { ab*, (a|c)*, bc*}, input string = abbcac
NFA
The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm.
State 5 recognizes the first expression (token T1); state 13 recognizes token T2; and state 18 recognizes token T3.
<dot-hack> digraph nfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 5 13 18
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1 1 -> 2 [label="a",fontsize=10] 2 -> 3 2 -> 5 3 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] 4 -> 3 4 -> 5
0 -> 6 6 -> 7 6 -> 13 7 -> 8 7 -> 10 8 -> 9 [label="a",fontsize=10] 9 -> 12 10 -> 11 [label="c",fontsize=10] 11 -> 12 12 -> 7 12 -> 13
0 -> 14 14 -> 15 [label="b",fontsize=10] 15 -> 16 15 -> 18 16 -> 17 [label="c",fontsize=10] 17 -> 16 17 -> 18 fontsize=10
} </dot-hack>
DFA
Determination table for the above NFA:
| In | α∈Σ | move(In, α) | ε-closure(move(In, α)) | In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 0 | 0, 1, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14 | 0 (T2) |
| 0 | a | 2, 9 | 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 | 1 (T1) |
| 0 | b | 15 | 15, 16, 18 | 2 (T3) |
| 0 | c | 11 | 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 | 3 (T2) |
| 1 | a | 9 | 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 | 4 (T2) |
| 1 | b | 4 | 3, 4, 5 | 5 (T1) |
| 1 | c | 11 | 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 | 3 (T2) |
| 2 | a | - | - | - |
| 2 | b | - | - | - |
| 2 | c | 17 | 16, 17, 18 | 6 (T3) |
| 3 | a | 9 | 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 | 4 (T2) |
| 3 | b | - | - | - |
| 3 | c | 11 | 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 | 3 (T2) |
| 4 | a | 9 | 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 | 4 (T2) |
| 4 | b | - | - | - |
| 4 | c | 11 | 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 | 3 (T2) |
| 5 | a | - | - | - |
| 5 | b | 4 | 3, 4, 5 | 5 (T1) |
| 5 | c | - | - | - |
| 6 | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | b | - | - | - |
| 6 | c | 17 | 16, 17, 18 | 6 (T3) |
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:
<dot-hack> digraph dfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1 [label="a",fontsize=10] 0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10] 0 -> 3 [label="c",fontsize=10]
1 -> 4 [label="a",fontsize=10] 1 -> 5 [label="b",fontsize=10] 1 -> 3 [label="c",fontsize=10]
2 -> 6 [label="c",fontsize=10]
3 -> 4 [label="a",fontsize=10] 3 -> 3 [label="c",fontsize=10]
4 -> 4 [label="a",fontsize=10] 4 -> 3 [label="c",fontsize=10]
5 -> 5 [label="b",fontsize=10]
6 -> 6 [label="c",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
} </dot-hack>
The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize.
<dot-hack> digraph mintree {
node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}" -> "{} " [label="NF",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}" -> "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " [label=" F",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " -> "{1, 5}" [label=" T1",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " -> "{0, 3, 4}" [label=" T2",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} " -> "{2, 6}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10]
"{1, 5}" -> "{1}"
"{1, 5}" -> "{5}" [label=" a",fontsize=10]
"{0, 3, 4}" -> "{0}"
"{0, 3, 4}" -> "{3, 4}" [label=" a",fontsize=10]
"{3, 4}" -> "{3, 4} " [label=" a,b,c",fontsize=10]
"{2, 6}" -> "{2, 6} " [label=" a,b,c",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
//label="Minimization tree"
} </dot-hack>
Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens.
<dot-hack> digraph mindfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 1 26 34 5
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1 [label="a",fontsize=10]
0 -> 26 [label="b",fontsize=10]
0 -> 34 [label="c",fontsize=10]
1 -> 34 [label="a,c",fontsize=10]
1 -> 5 [label="b",fontsize=10]
26 -> 26 [label="c",fontsize=10]
34 -> 34 [label="a,c",fontsize=10]
5 -> 5 [label="b",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
} </dot-hack>
Input Analysis
| In | Input | In+1 / Token |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | abbcac$ | 1 |
| 1 | bbcac$ | 5 |
| 5 | bcac$ | 5 |
| 5 | cac$ | T1 (abb) |
| 0 | cac$ | 34 |
| 34 | ac$ | 34 |
| 34 | c$ | 34 |
| 34 | $ | T2 (cac) |
The input string abbcac is, after 8 steps, split into two tokens: T1 (corresponding to lexeme abb), and T2 (cac).