Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 1: Difference between revisions

From Wiki**3

Root (talk | contribs)
Root (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Use Thompson's algorithm to build the NFA for the following regular expression. Build the corresponding DFA and minimize it.
Use Thompson's algorithm to build the NFA for the following regular expression. Build the corresponding DFA and minimize it.


* <nowiki>(a|b)*</nowiki>
* '''<nowiki>(a|b)*</nowiki>'''
     </div>
     </div>
   </div>
   </div>
Line 15: Line 15:
<!-- ====================== START OF SOLUTION ====================== -->
<!-- ====================== START OF SOLUTION ====================== -->


The non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA), built by applying Thompson's algorithm to the regular expression is the following:
The non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA), built by applying Thompson's algorithm to the regular expression '''<nowiki>(a|b)*</nowiki>''' is the following:


<graph>
<graph>
Line 39: Line 39:
</graph>
</graph>


== DFA ==
Applying the determination algorithm to the above NFA, the following determination table is obtained:
 
Determination table for the above NFA:


{| cellspacing="2"
{| cellspacing="2"
Line 92: Line 90:
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #e6e6e6;" | '''2'''
! style="font-weight: normal; align: center; background: #e6e6e6;" | '''2'''
|}
|}


{| width="100%"
{| width="100%"
Line 143: Line 140:
</graph>
</graph>
|}
|}
<!-- ====================== END OF SOLUTION ====================== -->
<!-- ====================== END OF SOLUTION ====================== -->
     </div>
     </div>

Revision as of 18:13, 18 February 2015

Problem

Use Thompson's algorithm to build the NFA for the following regular expression. Build the corresponding DFA and minimize it.

  • (a|b)*

Solution


The non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA), built by applying Thompson's algorithm to the regular expression (a|b)* is the following:

<graph> digraph nfa {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] start }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 7
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 start -> 0
 0 -> 1 
 1 -> 2 
 1 -> 4
 2 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 4 -> 5 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 3 -> 6
 5 -> 6
 6 -> 1
 6 -> 7
 0 -> 7
 fontsize=10
 //label="NFA for (a|b)*"

} </graph>

Applying the determination algorithm to the above NFA, the following determination table is obtained:

In α∈Σ move(In, α) ε-closure(move(In, α)) In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α))
- - 0 0, 1, 2, 4, 7 0
0 a 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 1
0 b 5 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 2
1 a 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 1
1 b 5 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 2
2 a 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 1
2 b 5 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 2
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:

<graph> digraph dfa {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] start }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 1 2
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 start -> 0
 0 -> 1 [label="a"]
 0 -> 2 [label="b"]
 1 -> 1  [label="a"]
 1 -> 2  [label="b"]
 2 -> 1 [label="a"]
 2 -> 2 [label="b"]
 fontsize=10
 //label="DFA for (a|b)*"

} </graph>

Given the minimization tree to the right, the final minimal DFA is: <graph> digraph dfamin {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] start }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.4,fontsize=10]; 012
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 start -> 012
 012 -> 012 [label="a"]
 012 -> 012 [label="b"]
 fontsize=10
 //label="DFA for (a|b)*"

} </graph>

The minimization tree is as follows. As can be seen, the states are indistinguishable.

<graph> digraph mintree {

 node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]
 " {0, 1, 2}" -> "{}" [label="NF",fontsize=10]
 " {0, 1, 2}" -> "{0, 1, 2}" [label="F",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 2}" -> "{0, 1, 2} " [label="a,b",fontsize=10]
 fontsize=10
 //label="Minimization tree"

} </graph>

Urna

3

Magna

4