Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 1: Difference between revisions

From Wiki**3

Root (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Root (talk | contribs)
Line 85: Line 85:
|}
|}


Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:
 
{| width="100%"
! style="text-align: left; font-weight:normal; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;" |Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:


<graph>
<graph>
Line 105: Line 107:
</graph>
</graph>


The minimization tree is as follows
Given the minimization tree to the right, the final minimal DFA is:
<graph>
digraph dfamin {
    { node [shape=circle style=invis] start }
  rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
  node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.4,fontsize=10]; 012
  node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
  start -> 012
  012 -> 012 [label="a"]
  012 -> 012 [label="b"]
  fontsize=10
  //label="DFA for (a|b)*"
}
</graph>
 
! style="text-align: left; font-weight:normal; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;" | The minimization tree is as follows. As can be seen, the states are indistinguishable.


<graph>
<graph>
Line 117: Line 134:
}
}
</graph>
</graph>
|}


[[category:Teaching]]
[[category:Teaching]]
[[category:Compilers]]
[[category:Compilers]]
[[en:Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis]]
[[en:Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis]]

Revision as of 23:52, 21 March 2009

Use Thompson's algorithm to build the NFA for the following regular expression. Build the corresponding DFA and minimize it.

  • (a|b)*

Solution

NFA

The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm.

<graph> digraph nfa {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] start }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 7
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 start -> 0
 0 -> 1 
 1 -> 2 
 1 -> 4
 2 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 4 -> 5 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 3 -> 6
 5 -> 6
 6 -> 1
 6 -> 7
 0 -> 7
 fontsize=10
 //label="NFA for (a|b)*"

} </graph>

DFA

Determination table for the above NFA:

In α∈Σ move(In, α) ε-closure(move(In, α)) In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α))
- - 0 0, 1, 2, 4, 7 0
0 a 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 1
0 b 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 2
1 a 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 1
1 b 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 2
2 a 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 1
2 b 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 2


Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:

<graph> digraph dfa {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] start }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 1 2
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 start -> 0
 0 -> 1 [label="a"]
 0 -> 2 [label="b"]
 1 -> 1  [label="a"]
 1 -> 2  [label="b"]
 2 -> 1 [label="a"]
 2 -> 2 [label="b"]
 fontsize=10
 //label="DFA for (a|b)*"

} </graph>

Given the minimization tree to the right, the final minimal DFA is: <graph> digraph dfamin {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] start }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.4,fontsize=10]; 012
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 start -> 012
 012 -> 012 [label="a"]
 012 -> 012 [label="b"]
 fontsize=10
 //label="DFA for (a|b)*"

} </graph>

The minimization tree is as follows. As can be seen, the states are indistinguishable.

<graph> digraph mintree {

 node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]
 " {0, 1, 2}" -> "{}" [label="NF",fontsize=10]
 " {0, 1, 2}" -> "{0, 1, 2}" [label="F",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 2}" -> "{0, 1, 2} " [label="a,b",fontsize=10]
 fontsize=10
 //label="Minimization tree"

} </graph>