Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 7: Difference between revisions
From Wiki**3
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm. State '''8''' recognizes the first expression (token '''T1'''); state '''12''' recognizes token '''T2'''; and state '''20''' recognizes token '''T3'''. | The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm. State '''8''' recognizes the first expression (token '''T1'''); state '''12''' recognizes token '''T2'''; and state '''20''' recognizes token '''T3'''. | ||
< | <kroki lang="graphviz"> | ||
digraph nfa { | digraph nfa { | ||
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | { node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
fontsize=10 | fontsize=10 | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </kroki> | ||
== DFA == | == DFA == | ||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows: | Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows: | ||
< | <kroki lang="graphviz"> | ||
digraph dfa { | digraph dfa { | ||
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | { node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | ||
| Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
fontsize=10 | fontsize=10 | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </kroki> | ||
The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize. | The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize. | ||
< | <kroki lang="graphviz"> | ||
digraph mintree { | digraph mintree { | ||
node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10] | node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10] | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{4}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10] | "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{4}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10] | ||
"{0, 1, 2, 3}" -> "{0, 1, 3}" [label=" a",fontsize=10] | "{0, 1, 2, 3}" -> "{0, 1, 3}" [label=" a",fontsize=10] | ||
"{0, 1, 2, 3}" -> "{2}" | "{0, 1, 2, 3}" -> "{2}" | ||
"{0, 1, 3}" -> "{0}" [label=" b",fontsize=10] | "{0, 1, 3}" -> "{0}" [label=" b",fontsize=10] | ||
"{0, 1, 3}" -> "{1,3}" | "{0, 1, 3}" -> "{1,3}" | ||
"{1,3}" -> "{1,3} " [label=" a,b",fontsize=10] | |||
fontsize=10 | fontsize=10 | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </kroki> | ||
Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens. | Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens. | ||
< | <kroki lang="graphviz"> | ||
digraph mindfa { | digraph mindfa { | ||
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | { node [shape=circle style=invis] s } | ||
| Line 183: | Line 181: | ||
fontsize=10 | fontsize=10 | ||
} | } | ||
</ | </kroki> | ||
== Input Analysis == | == Input Analysis == | ||
Latest revision as of 18:42, 26 April 2026
Compute the non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) by using Thompson's algorithm. Compute the minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA).
The alphabet is Σ = { a, b }. Indicate the number of processing steps for the given input string.
- G = { a*|b, a*, b*|a }, input string = aababb
NFA
The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm. State 8 recognizes the first expression (token T1); state 12 recognizes token T2; and state 20 recognizes token T3.
HTTP-Response:
error code: 1015
Diagram-Code:
digraph nfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 8 12 20
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1
1 -> 2
1 -> 6
2 -> 3
2 -> 5
3 -> 4 [label="a",fontsize=10]
4 -> 3
4 -> 5
5 -> 8
6 -> 7 [label="b",fontsize=10]
7 -> 8
0 -> 9
9 -> 10
9 -> 12
10 -> 11 [label="a",fontsize=10]
11 -> 10
11 -> 12
0 -> 13
13 -> 14
13 -> 18
14 -> 15
14 -> 17
15 -> 16 [label="b",fontsize=10]
16 -> 15
16 -> 17
17 -> 20
18 -> 19 [label="a",fontsize=10]
19 -> 20
fontsize=10
}
DFA
Determination table for the above NFA:
| In | α∈Σ | move(In, α) | ε-closure(move(In, α)) | In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 0 | 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 | 0 (T1) |
| 0 | a | 4, 11, 19 | 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20 | 1 (T1) |
| 0 | b | 7, 16 | 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, 20 | 2 (T1) |
| 1 | a | 4, 11 | 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 3 (T1) |
| 1 | b | - | - | - |
| 2 | a | - | - | - |
| 2 | b | 16 | 15, 16, 17, 20 | 4 (T3) |
| 3 | a | 4, 11 | 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12 | 3 (T1) |
| 3 | b | - | - | - |
| 4 | a | - | - | - |
| 4 | b | 16 | 15, 16, 17, 20 | 4 (T3) |
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:
HTTP-Response:
error code: 1015
Diagram-Code:
digraph dfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 1 2 3 4
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1 [label="a",fontsize=10]
0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10]
1 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10]
2 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
3 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10]
4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
}
The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize.
HTTP-Response:
error code: 1015
Diagram-Code:
digraph mintree {
node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{}" [label="NF",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " [label=" F",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{0, 1, 2, 3}" [label=" T1",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{4}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3}" -> "{0, 1, 3}" [label=" a",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 2, 3}" -> "{2}"
"{0, 1, 3}" -> "{0}" [label=" b",fontsize=10]
"{0, 1, 3}" -> "{1,3}"
"{1,3}" -> "{1,3} " [label=" a,b",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
}
Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens.
HTTP-Response:
error code: 1015
Diagram-Code:
digraph mindfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 13 2 4
node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 13 [label="a",fontsize=10]
0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10]
13 -> 13 [label="a",fontsize=10]
2 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
fontsize=10
}
Input Analysis
| In | Input | In+1 / Token |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | aababb$ | 13 |
| 13 | ababb$ | 13 |
| 13 | babb$ | T1 (aa) |
| 0 | babb$ | 2 |
| 2 | abb$ | T1 (b) |
| 0 | abb$ | 13 |
| 13 | bb$ | T1 (a) |
| 0 | bb$ | 2 |
| 2 | b$ | 4 |
| 4 | $ | T3 (bb) |
The input string aababb is, after 10 steps, split into three tokens: T1 (corresponding to lexeme aa), T1 (b), T1 (a), and T3 (bb).